They’ve taught us to think about that the extra requirements and “good practices”Undertake an organization, the higher … since that suggests that it is going to be Following the way in which your business leaders work. And naturally, in the event you imitate the way in which of working of the most effective, you’ll appear like them Or is that a good way to change into a junior?
We name “finest practices / good practices”From an business to exactly that, to the methodologies and processes that have been shown to be successful in entrance of others and who’ve been extensively adopted by a lot of the business. They’re methodologies which have normally been created after analyzing the way in which of working of the leaders of the sector they usually begin from the premise that if the remainder of the businesses imitate them, the standard of their work will enhance.
That’s, they’re a method of homogenizing the standard with which we work via standardization
And that’s exactly the big danger concerned: they push us all to compete utilizing the identical processes, these utilized by business leaders … or what’s the similar, to extend the hole between them and us, perpetuating us as “followers” of his method of working and pushing us to attempt to be prime that they. However:
Attempting to be higher than the chief of your business leads you to enter the rat race, to compete in line with their guidelines … unhealthy enterprise.
These “good practices”, which frequently find yourself being developed to a high quality normal, crystallize the way in which these giant firms needed to work on the time they have been conceived (not essentially now) Y lead us to attempt to compete utilizing all the identical processes… Which mechanically makes cease being a aggressive benefit. For instance:
When only some firms had adopted the ISO 9.001 high quality normal, following it and being licensed was a aggressive benefit. In the present day is solely doing what everybody else does.
I’ve labored with many firms, and along with utilizing my very own expertise as a criterion, I’ve requested many individuals if following these good practices or work requirements had been decisive for his or her competitiveness, and NOBODY has ever mentioned sure. Constructive, presumably figuring out, completely. And above all they focus us completely in direction of effectivity, one other of the nice enemies of innovation.
And what in regards to the tons of paper formed studies, information…and so forth. What do we’ve got to create? If you’re a big multinational and you’ll afford that waste of time, excellent … however for many “regular” firms you should utilize far more agile strategies for instance to implement traceability.
Moreover, we are sometimes pushed to undertake approaches and options that do not actually match the context of our scenario and that they have been designed for an additional sort of firm, in different circumstances and with different issues … maybe essentially the most major problem that the “finest practices”:
It is like driving with the map of one other metropolis in one other hemisphere. Sure, there are roads, visitors lights, detours and street junctions … however though the bottom is frequent, our context is totally different and we are going to find yourself misplaced.
Our nice buddy already says it Dilbert:
Does that imply that it’s a unhealthy thought to undertake such good practices or requirements? Completely. What could be very adverse is the angle to which they lead us, to the position of “follower” of the greats and to do issues in the identical method as everybody else. Why after all
Our small firm can not invent a greater / extra environment friendly method of doing issues than the nice dinosaur that leads the business, can it?
WHAT DO YOU THINK?